The
Papacy
of the Plot![]() If at any time you desire a larger more detailed imageof either
individuals or locations mentioned in the text please click
here Help Window
|
It is only by learning about the
nature of the 17th century Papacy
that one can truly appreciate the threat that the Catholic Church represented to the developing nation of England.
|
Freedom Fighters? Criminals/Terrorists?
Agents of an Archaic Evil Empire?
In 1605 most of the people of England were Protestant
followers of the state religion.
Often when discussing the Gunpowder Plot supporters of
the position of the plotters and Catholics in general generally describe
them as a persecuted minority. Surely this is an oversimplification.
First of all there were many varieties of Catholic in
England. Many did only want to pursue their own religious practices in
private without converting others or otherwise attacking the state. Others
including the plotters, many members of the Catholic aristocracy, priests
and jesuits on the other hand wanted nothing less that a counter-reformation
which would destroy the state religion if not the state itself and return
them to positions of power and dominance where they would install the pope
as their supreme authority in the place of the monarch. Both violent and
peaceful means were seen as pathways to this end. Unfortunately the state
had no way of knowing which were the good and which the dangerous. None
the less the state did continue to maintain influential Catholics at court
in high positions as well as to include Catholics in the Parliament.
In 1605 Jesuit activity while carried out by exiled English priests trained abroad was in fact an invasion of England by a foreign power:The Papacy. It was a persecution of those considered "heretics" that is members of the State Church by representatives of the Papacy. The mission was clear: return to England,convert its citizens and destroy the "heretic" church. The fact that they were instructed to do it politely did not change matters. The Pope had boldly instructed English citizens not to folow the leaders of their own nation. The intent was the same as war itself.
Had a significant majority of English citizens wished to cast off the state religion then one would have to consider the Jesuits and our conspirators to have been freedom fighters. However, this was not the case and we must therefore consider them to be foreign invaders. Defense of one's government, one's nation and homeland against foreign invaders can not be considered persecution.
Perhaps the example of Mexico might assist in furthering understanding. In Mexico it was written that the Jesuit missionaries were persecuted that is captured, and executed. While it was true that they were attacked and did suffer they were not the casualties of persecution but of warfare- casualties in a war which they themselves had brought to the pagan natives.
Despite the many personal and Religious purposes of the Plotters we must continue to acknowledge and respect their considerable bravery and courage in the pursuit of their values despite the painful consequences which they knew would follow from their failure.
In the study of the Gunpowder Plot it is essential to
view efforts toward the conversion of souls from both sides of the theological
divide. But what did the pope and his officials know of the terrorism planned
by the plotters? Could they have stopped the plot before it had a chance
to threaten lives, property and government?
Surely we do know one thing. Keeping information which
could have prevented human suffering and death behind the seal of the confessional
can only be an act inspired by the corrupting forces of power and imperialism.
Surely you do not go to such lenghts to protect the seal in such cases
if you are concerned with human wellbeing.
. Back to the Start
What did the Pope or his Officials know of the Plot and When?
The reaction of the Pope and his officials to knowledge
of the Gunpowder Plot was the
ultimate and supreme test of their commitment to peaceful
means and to co-existence with
temporal rulers within a pluralistic society. If
this test was set up by the government it very
accurately found its mark. The Pope and his representatives
failed miserably.
What did the pope and his officials know about the Gunpowder
Plot before it happened?
The answer is: Quite A bit.
In the Summer of 1604 Father Henry Garnet- Superior of
the Jesuits in England wrote to
Aquaviva (his Superior in Rome)
that he understood from some friends that:
"Mr. Catesby was much missing from the places where he was wont to resort continually for spiritual help; and hearing also, that he and other gentlemen of forward humor did keep much together and had many secret meetings he began to suspect that they had something in hand"
Later in 1605 Garnet had a revealing conversation with Mr. Catesby:
""Mr. Catesby asked whether if one intended lawfully to kill any man he might do it, notwithstanding the hazards of innocents.....I...answered that oftentimes in wars such things were done, so that they were such as the victory might countervail the innocent' death"
Garnet so suspected Catesby that when his superior Fr. Aquaviva General of the Jesuits had heard of plots by English Catholics Garnet found Catesby at Fremlands in Sussex where he cautioned Catesby about "rushing headlong into mischief" and notified him that Aquaviva had conveyed similar "official" warnings from the pope.
At this point Catesby insisted that if the Pope personally knew the details of what he had planned that he would be supportive. Garnet should have had no doubt at this time of Catesby's dangerous and ilegal intent. Garnet rather than finding a way to turn Catesby in to the authorities suggests that Catesby communicate his plan to the pope by way of a leading Catholic- Sir Edmund Baynham who was shortly to meet with the Papal Nuncio in Brussels.
In essence then, the pope was asked to judge that which was an issue for the government and laws of England. Garnet had acted in the past to betray Catholic Plotters- He and Father George Blackwell (the archpriest) Had uncovered and informed the government of the Bye plot which had been orchestrated by Father William Watson. The difference was that Watson was merely a secular priest and Catesby was a well connected and powerful member of the Catholic elite with many important Catholic friends.
In July 1665 Father Oswald Tesimond having heard of the
plot via Confessional from
Catesby passed the information on to Father Garnet also
under seal of the Confessional. With permission for Tesimond to pass the
information under seal to Garnet.
While Garnet could not reveal names and details he did
soon thereafter contacted the pope with this request:
"The danger is lest secretly some treason of violence
be shown to the King and so all catholics may be compelled to take arms.
Wherefore in my judgment two things are necessary; first that his Holiness
should prescribe what in any case is to be done, and then that he should
forbid any force of arms to the Catholics under censures"
Garnet asked the pope for special powers to allow him
to act against anyone suspected of plotting by excommunicating them. The
pope did not extend these powers but instead in September replying by way
of Father Persons asked for specific details of the specific case- details
which Garnet due to the seal, could not provide. (The seal was eventually
broken by Catesby himself by writing to Garnet on Nov. 6 after the failure
of the plot)
Garnet's loyal and close friend Anne Vaux had told him that she had seen Catesby and others coming and going from her house and priest hide White Webs.
The record shows clearly that the pope and his representatives
knew far enough in advance
of the plot to have aided in the apprehension of the
conspirators. Yet nothing was done to physically stop the plotters. Back
to the Start
The Papacy and Nationalism
At the time of the plot England was a nation only recently
united from many different parts by Elizabeth I. The people
were beginning to think of themselves as English rather than as Protestants
or Catholics. This sense of national Identity was to be the solution to
the religious conflicts which had plagued English history. For Elizabeth
this meant that the power and resources of important Catholics could
be harnessed by the nation. This explains the presence of so many English
Catholics at court and the influential positions which they held.
By the time of James I even English Catholics were becoming
more "English" some even wanted to reconcile with the "heretic" state church.
The Elizabethan dream of national identity was however, constantly
threatened by those who wished to set the clock back
to the time prior to Henry VIII when the Catholic Church still exercised
significant, and often tyrannical power over the people
and rulers of England.
By studying the 17th Century Papacy one can gain an appreciation of the nature of the Catholic Church of the period. It was truly a power bent upon conquest both of souls and of nations as well as new frontiers. It was not at all tolerant of the religions of "heretics" be they Protestant Non-Believers, Members of other Churches, or, Native Peoples of the new colonies. The church had placed itself and all of its resources directly in opposition to the pluralistic nation state which was developing in England and which was eventually to serve as the foundation for the development of modern democracies.
The church provided its support for all of the enemies
of England- nations like Spain and Terrorists and Criminals like the plotters.
We can only wonder what would have become of the dream of the pluralistic
nation state had the plotters and the pope managed to set the clock
back to more primitive times. Take a moment to read below,of the
major Catholic figures of the age. Make up your own mind and let us know
what you think. (Page editor comments shown in italics)
Back to the Start
| Pope Clement VIII | Pope LeoXI | Pope Paul V |
| Claudius Acquaviva | St.Philip Neri | The Catholic Encyclopedia |
Pope Clement VIII (1592-March/1605)
-The Pope Which Informed the plot Among the popes there have been poor men in plenty, but
Clement VIII was the
Clement was above all a spiritual pope. For years Philip
Neri had been his
Clement's great achievement was the settlement of the
French problem. Henry of
Clement was a great mission pope. Under his vigorous leadership,
the enterprising
Two famous executions took place in Clement's reign--that
of the parricide Beatrice
Excerpted from "Popes Through the Ages" by Joseph Brusher, S.J
Back
to the table
Pope Leo XI-1605
Leo XI was a member of the famous Medici family and a
grandnephew of Leo X.
Alessandro de' Medici was born in 1555. He was a pious
lad and was so fond of the
Naturally the Spaniards were opposed to him, and his chances
for the papacy were
Easter Sunday, April 17, the coronation day of Leo, was
a gala occasion for the
Leo XI died piously on April 27,1605. Although he had
ruled so short a time, he
Excerpted from "Popes Through the Ages" by Joseph Brusher Back
to the table
Pope Paul V 1605-1621
Baronius and St. Robert Bellarmine were among those considered
as successors of
Paul V was a vigorous fifty-two(error?55?(1605)) when
elected. Pious and learned, charitable and
Paul V had a hard time with Venice. The republic's pride
seemed to swell in
Wily King James of England also gave trouble to Paul.
He issued a new oath of
A great patron of art, Paul V succeeded in having Carlo
Maderna finally bring the
Paul V died of a stroke on January 28,1621. Excerpted from "Popes Through the Ages" by Joseph Brusher,
S.J. Back to the table
Influential Figures and Advisors of the Popes Claudius Acquaviva
During Acquaviva's administration, the protracted controversy
on Grace, between the Dominicans and the Jesuits, took place, and was carried
on with some interruptions for nearly nine years, without either party
drawing any decision from the Church, the contestants being ultimately
ordered to discontinue the discussion. It was Acquaviva who ordered the
scheme of Jesuit studies, known as the "Ratio Studiorum" (q.v.), to be
drawn up which, with some modifications, has been followed to the present
day. Six of the most learned and experienced scholars of the Society were
summoned toRome, who laid out the entire plan of studies, beginning with
theology, philosophy and their cognate branches, and going down to the
smallest details of grammar. When finished, it was sent to the different
Provinces for suggestions, but was not imposed until 1592, and then with
the proviso that
The period of his generalship was the most notable in
the history of the Society for the men it
Jouvency, Epitome Hist. Soc. Jesu, IV; Crétineau-Joly, Historie
de la Comp de Jesus III; Varones Ilustres, V, 79;
APOSTLE OF ROME, b. at Florence, Italy, 22 July, 1515;
d. 27 May, 1595. Philip's family
From the first it was evident that Philip's career would
run on no conventional lines; when shown his family pedigree he tore it
up, and the burning of his father's house left him unconcerned. Having
studied the humanities under the best scholars of a scholarly generation,
at the age of sixteen he was sent to help his father's cousin in business
at S. Germano, near Monte Cassino. He applied himself with diligence, and
his kinsman soon determined to make him his heir. But he would often withdraw
for prayer to a little mountain chapel belonging to the Benedictines of
Monte Cassino, built above the harbour of Gaeta in a cleft of rock which
tradition says was among those rent at the hour of Our Lord's death. It
was here that his vocation became definite: he was called to be the Apostle
of Rome.
He now devoted himself entirely to the sanctification
of his own soul and the good of his neighbour.
During his last years as a layman, Philip's apostolate
spread rapidly. In 1548, together with his
In 1551, however, he received a true vocation from God.
At the bidding of his confessor -- nothing short of this would overcome
his humility -- he entered the priesthood, and went to live at S. Girolamo,
where a staff of chaplains was supported by the Confraternity of Charity.
Each priest had two rooms assigned to him, in which he lived, slept, and
ate, under no rule save that of living in charity with his brethren. Among
Philip's new companions, besides Persiano Rosa, was Buonsignore Cacciaguerra
(see "A Precursor of St. Philip" by Lady Amabel Kerr, London), a remarkable
penitent, who was at that time carrying on a vigorous propaganda in favour
of frequent Communion.
Philip devoted his afternoons to men and boys, inviting
them to informal meetings in his room, taking them to visit churches, interesting
himself in their amusements, hallowing with his sweet influence every department
of their lives. At one time he had a longing desire to follow the example
of St.Francis Xavier, and go to India. With this end in view, he hastened
the ordination of some of his companions. But in 1557 he sought the counsel
of a Cistercian at Tre Fontane; and as on a former occasion he had been
told to make Rome his desert, so now the monk communicated to him arevelation
he had had from St. John the Evangelist, that Rome was to be his India.
Philip at once abandoned the idea of going abroad, and in the following
year the informal meetings in his room developed into regular spiritual
exercises in an oratory, which he built over the church. At these exercises
laymen preached and the excellence of the discourses, the high quality
of the music, and the charm of Philip's personality attracted not
only the humble and lowly, but men of the highest rank and distinction
in Church and State. Of these, in 1590, Cardinal Nicolo Sfondrato, became
Pope Gregory XIV, and the extreme reluctance of the saint alone prevented
the pontiff from forcing him to accept the cardinalate. In 1559, Philip
began to organize regular visits to the Seven Churches, in company with
crowds of men, priests and religious, and laymen of every rank and condition.
These
The last years of his life were marked by alternate sickness
and recovery. In 1593, he showed the true greatness of one who knows the
limits of his own endurance, and resigned the office of superior
which had been conferred on him for life. In 1594, when he was in an agony
of pain, the Blessed Virgin appeared to him, and cured him. At the end
of March, 1595, he had a severe attack of fever, which lasted
throughout April; but in answer to his special prayer God gave him strength
to y Mass on 1 May in honour of SS. Philip and James. On the following
12 May he was seized with a violent haemorrhage, and Cardinal Baronius,
who had succeeded him as superior, gave him Extreme Unction. After that
he seemed to revive a little and his friend Cardinal Frederick Borromeo
brought him the Viaticum, which he received with loud protestations
of his own unworthiness. On the next day he was
perfectly well, and till the actual day of his death went about his usual
duties, even reciting the Divine Office, from which he
was dispensed. But on 15 May he predicted that he had only ten more
days to live. On 25 May, the feast of Corpus Christi, he went to say Mass
in his little chapel, two hours earlier than usual. "At the
beginning of his Mass", writes Bacci, "he remained for some time looking
fixedly at the hill of S. Onofrio, which was visible from the chapel, just
as if he saw some
It is perhaps by the method of contrast that the distinctive characteristics of St. Philip and his work are brought home to us most forcibly (see Newman, "Sermons on Various Occasions", n. xii;"Historical Sketches", III, end of ch. vii). We hail him as the patient reformer, who leaves outwardthings alone and works from within, depending rather on the hidden might of sacrament and prayer than on drastic policies of external improvement; the director of souls who attaches more value to mortification of the reason than to bodily austerities, protests that men may become saints in the world no less than in the cloister, dwells on the importance of serving God in a cheerful spirit, and gives a quaintly humorous turn to the maxims of ascetical theology; the silent watcher of the times, who takes no active part in ecclesiastical controversies and is yet a motive force in their development, now encouraging the use of ecclesiastical history as a bulwark against Protestantism, now insisting on the absolution of a monarch, whom other counsellors would fain exclude from the sacraments (see BARONIUS), now praying that God may avert a threatened condemnation (see SAVONAROLA) and receiving a miraculous assurance that his prayer is heard (see Letter of Ercolani referred to by Capecelatro); the founder of a Congregation, which relies more on personal influence than on disciplinary organization, and prefers the spontaneous practice of counsels of perfection to their enforcement by means of vows; above all, the saint of God, who is so irresistibly attractive, so eminently lovable in himself, as to win the title of the "Amabile santo". C. SEBASTIAN RITCHIE
|
|
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|